Fix Task Display Shows Unnamed A Comprehensive Guide

by ADMIN 53 views
Iklan Headers

Introduction

Gaming and technology enthusiasts, developers, and QA testers, gather around! We have an important issue to discuss that impacts task visibility and management across the Attio system. This article dives deep into a critical bug where all tasks are displayed as "Unnamed," regardless of their actual content. This bug makes it impossible to distinguish between different tasks, creating a poor user experience. We will explore the problem statement, current behavior, a detailed QA test case, expected behavior, acceptance criteria, technical details, and potential fixes. So, let’s dive in and get this fixed, guys!

🐛 Bug Description

The core issue is that all tasks are displaying as "Unnamed," which makes identifying and managing them a real headache. Imagine a to-do list where everything is just labeled “Unnamed” – total chaos, right? This bug affects every corner of the task management system, making it impossible for users to distinguish between different tasks. This not only hinders productivity but also leads to a frustrating user experience. This is a significant problem, and we need to address it ASAP.

🔍 Problem Statement

The problem is pretty straightforward: every task retrieved through the MCP server shows “Unnamed” as its display name. This happens even when the tasks have actual names, titles, or descriptions in the Attio system. It's like the system is deliberately hiding the task names from us! This makes it impossible to differentiate between tasks, turning task lists into a jumbled mess. To put it simply, this bug cripples the core functionality of task management.

Impact on User Experience

The impact on the user experience is significant. Users rely on task names and titles to quickly identify and prioritize their work. When every task shows up as “Unnamed,” it’s impossible to tell what needs to be done. This leads to confusion, wasted time, and a general sense of frustration. It’s like trying to find a specific book in a library where all the books have blank covers. Good luck with that! So, let's explore the nitty-gritty of this issue and figure out how to resolve it.

📊 Current Behavior

Let's break down the current behavior to get a clearer picture of the issue:

  1. All tasks display as "Unnamed" in search results: When users search for tasks, they are greeted with a list of “Unnamed” entries. This makes search functionality completely useless, as users cannot identify the tasks they are looking for.
  2. Task details show "Unnamed" even with valid content: Even when viewing the details of a specific task, the display name remains “Unnamed,” despite the task having actual content. This is like opening a present only to find an empty box – disappointing and unhelpful.
  3. Task lists are unusable due to lack of identification: Task lists become a sea of “Unnamed” entries, making it impossible to prioritize or manage tasks effectively. This can lead to missed deadlines and a general sense of overwhelm.
  4. Users cannot distinguish between different tasks: The most significant impact is the inability to differentiate between tasks. Users are left guessing what each task is about, which is a major productivity killer.

This behavior is not only inconvenient but also makes the task management system virtually unusable. We need to squash this bug, guys!

🧪 QA Test Case for Verification

To verify the issue, we need a robust test case. Here’s a detailed JavaScript QA test case designed to identify and confirm the "Unnamed" task display bug:

// Test Case: Verify task display names
async function testTaskDisplayNames() {
 console.log('Testing Task Display Names...\n');
 
 // Test 1: Search for tasks and check display names
 console.log('Test 1: Search Tasks and Check Display Names');
 try {
 const result = await mcp.callTool('search-records', {
 object: 'tasks',
 query: '',
 limit: 10
 });
 
 if (result && result.data && result.data.length > 0) {
 console.log(`Found ${result.data.length} tasks\n`);
 
 let unnamedCount = 0;
 let namedCount = 0;
 
 result.data.forEach((task, index) => {
 const displayName = task.name || task.title || task.description || 'UNNAMED';
 
 if (displayName === 'Unnamed' || displayName === 'UNNAMED') {
 unnamedCount++;
 console.log(`❌ Task ${index + 1}: Shows as "Unnamed"`);
 console.log(` Raw data: ${JSON.stringify(task).substring(0, 100)}...`);
 } else {
 namedCount++;
 console.log(`✅ Task ${index + 1}: ${displayName}`);
 }
 });
 
 console.log(`\nSummary: ${namedCount} named, ${unnamedCount} unnamed`);
 
 if (unnamedCount === 0) {
 console.log('✅ All tasks display with proper names');
 return true;
 } else if (unnamedCount === result.data.length) {
 console.log('❌ All tasks show as "Unnamed" - critical bug');
 return false;
 } else {
 console.log('⚠️ Some tasks show as "Unnamed"');
 return false;
 }
 } else {
 console.log('⚠️ No tasks found to test');
 }
 } catch (error) {
 console.log('❌ Failed to search tasks:', error.message);
 return false;
 }

 // Test 2: Get specific task details
 console.log('\nTest 2: Get Specific Task Details');
 try {
 // First, create a task with a clear name
 const newTask = await mcp.callTool('create-record', {
 object: 'tasks',
 attributes: {
 name: 'QA Test Task - Display Name Verification',
 description: 'This task should have a clear display name',
 status: 'pending'
 }
 });
 
 if (newTask && newTask.data && newTask.data.id) {
 // Now retrieve it
 const taskDetails = await mcp.callTool('get-record-details', {
 object: 'tasks',
 record_id: newTask.data.id
 });
 
 const displayName = taskDetails.data.name || 
 taskDetails.data.title || 
 taskDetails.data.description;
 
 if (displayName && displayName !== 'Unnamed') {
 console.log(`✅ Created task displays as: ${displayName}`);
 } else {
 console.log(`❌ Created task shows as "Unnamed" despite having name`);
 console.log(` Expected: "QA Test Task - Display Name Verification"`);
 console.log(` Actual data: ${JSON.stringify(taskDetails.data).substring(0, 200)}`);
 return false;
 }
 
 // Clean up
 await mcp.callTool('delete-record', {
 object: 'tasks',
 record_id: newTask.data.id
 });
 } 
 } catch (error) {
 console.log('❌ Task creation/retrieval test failed:', error.message);
 }

 // Test 3: Check field mapping
 console.log('\nTest 3: Field Mapping Verification');
 try {
 const attributes = await mcp.callTool('get-attributes', {
 object: 'tasks'
 });
 
 console.log('Task attributes available:');
 const nameFields = ['name', 'title', 'subject', 'description', 'content'];
 
 nameFields.forEach(field => {
 const hasField = attributes.data?.some(attr => 
 attr.slug === field || attr.name === field
 );
 
 if (hasField) {
 console.log(`✅ Field "${field}" is available`);
 } else {
 console.log(`⚠️ Field "${field}" not found in attributes`);
 }
 });
 } catch (error) {
 console.log('❌ Failed to get task attributes:', error.message);
 }

 return true;
}

Test Case Breakdown

This test case includes three main tests:

  1. Search Tasks and Check Display Names: This test searches for tasks and verifies whether they are displayed with proper names or as “Unnamed.” It checks a batch of tasks to see if the issue is widespread.
  2. Get Specific Task Details: This test creates a new task with a clear name and then retrieves its details to ensure the display name is correct. This helps confirm if the issue occurs during task creation or retrieval.
  3. Field Mapping Verification: This test checks the field mapping configuration to ensure the correct fields (e.g., name, title, description) are being used for task display. Correct field mapping is crucial for displaying the right information.

This comprehensive test case provides a clear way to verify the bug and ensure that the fix works as expected.

✅ Expected Behavior

So, what should happen when everything is working correctly? Here’s the expected behavior:

  • Tasks display with their actual names/titles: The primary expectation is that tasks are displayed using their actual names or titles, making them easily identifiable.
  • Task content is properly mapped to display fields: The system should correctly map task content to the appropriate display fields, such as name, title, or description. This ensures that the relevant information is shown to the user.
  • Users can identify tasks by their content: Users should be able to quickly identify tasks based on their displayed content, allowing for efficient task management.
  • Search results show meaningful task descriptions: Search results should show task names or titles, not just “Unnamed,” enabling users to find tasks easily.

In short, the system should behave in a way that makes task identification and management intuitive and straightforward. No more guessing games!

🎯 Acceptance Criteria

To ensure that the fix is effective and meets our expectations, we need clear acceptance criteria. Here’s a list of criteria that must be met:

  • [ ] Tasks display their actual name/title/description
  • [ ] No tasks show as "Unnamed" when they have content
  • [ ] Field mapping correctly identifies display fields
  • [ ] Search results show task identifiers
  • [ ] Task lists are readable and identifiable
  • [ ] QA test shows 100% named tasks
  • [ ] Documentation updated with correct field mappings

Meeting these criteria will guarantee that the bug is completely resolved and that the task management system is functioning correctly. No more “Unnamed” tasks!

🔧 Technical Details

Let's get technical! Understanding the root cause and potential fixes requires diving into the technical details.

Root Cause Analysis:

  1. Incorrect field mapping for task display names: The system might be looking at the wrong field for task names, leading to the “Unnamed” display.
  2. Wrong attribute used for task title/name: A specific attribute, like name, might not be correctly mapped or used in the display logic.
  3. Missing field in API response processing: The API response might not be including the necessary task name or title field, causing the display logic to fail.
  4. Display logic defaulting to "Unnamed" incorrectly: The display logic might have a flaw that causes it to default to “Unnamed” even when task names are available.

Files to Check:

To pinpoint the exact cause, we need to check these files:

  • /src/types/tasks.ts - Task type definitions: This file defines the structure of task objects and can help identify if the correct fields are present.
  • /src/api/tasks.ts - Task API response processing: This file handles how task data is received from the API and can reveal if data is being parsed correctly.
  • /src/handlers/tasks.ts - Task display logic: This file contains the logic for displaying task information and can highlight issues in how names are retrieved and displayed.
  • Field mapping configuration: Checking the field mapping configuration will ensure that the system is looking at the correct fields for task names.

Potential Fixes:

Based on the root cause analysis, here are some potential fixes:

  1. Map the correct field for task display (likely content, subject, or title). This ensures the system is looking at the right place for the task name.
  2. Update display logic to check multiple fields. If the name field is missing, the system should check other fields like title or description.
  3. Fix API response parsing for task names. Ensure that the API response is correctly parsed to extract task names.
  4. Add fallback logic for display names. If no name is found, a fallback mechanism should be in place to display alternative information.

These technical details and potential fixes provide a solid foundation for resolving the bug.

🚨 Priority

The priority for this bug is P1 - High. This is a major UX issue because tasks are completely unidentifiable. A P1 priority means this needs to be fixed ASAP because it severely impacts the user experience and the usability of the system. We need to get this fixed pronto!

📅 Testing Notes

Here are some important testing notes:

  • Date Reported: 2025-08-11
  • Impact: All tasks affected
  • Test Data: 126 tasks in the test environment all show as "Unnamed"

These notes highlight the severity and scope of the issue. The fact that all tasks in the test environment are affected underscores the urgency of the fix.

🔗 Related

To provide context and related information, here are some relevant links:

  • QA Testing Session: 2025-08-11
  • Issue #392: Previous QA findings (closed)
  • Tasks functionality implementation

These links can provide additional insights and background information, helping to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Conclusion

The "Unnamed" task display bug is a critical issue that significantly impacts user experience and task management. By understanding the bug description, problem statement, current behavior, QA test case, expected behavior, acceptance criteria, technical details, and priority, we can effectively address and resolve this issue. Let's work together to squash this bug and make the task management system usable again! Thanks for reading, guys!